Cases 11 - 20 of 51
ATKINS v. ANTISKAY
as 1:2019cv03513
Respondent:
MICHAEL ANTISKAY
Petitioner:
MAKEBA ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Halogenated Solvents Industry v. EPA
as 19-1115
Petitioner:
Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance, Inc
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Not Yet Classified:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Lauren Atkins, Wendy Hartley and others
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ATKINS v. BLANCO
as 1:2018cv01207
Petitioner:
MAKEBA ATKINS
Respondent:
ANDREW BLANCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ATKINS v. DAVIS
as 1:2018cv01208
Petitioner:
MAKEBA ATKINS
Respondent:
KARL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
IACCARINO et al v. KELLY et al
as 1:2017cv00857
Plaintiff:
DEREK IACCARINO and CARLOS CASTILLO
Defendant:
JOHN F. KELLY, VALERIE J. ATKINS and CONNIE L. PATRICK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
