Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Oppenheimer v. AtkinsRealis USA Inc.
as 8:2024cv00203
Defendant:
AtkinsRealis USA Inc. and Atkins North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CANNON v. ATKIN OLSHIN SCHADE ARCHITECTS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
BILL CANNON
Defendant:
ATKIN OLSHIN SCHADE ARCHITECTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Reiffer v. Atkin
as 1:2022cv08466
Plaintiff:
Paul Reiffer
Defendant:
Michael W. Atkin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nicolas Atkins et al v. Steve Madden Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv07360
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Atkins and Benjamin Solomon
Defendant:
Steve Madden Ltd. and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Handyside v. Bernard Atkins et al
as 1:2021cv00422
Defendant:
Etsy, Inc. and Bernard Atkins
Plaintiff:
Shawn Handyside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Konad Co., Ltd v. OMG Marketing Ltd, et al
as 2:2019cv02394
Defendant:
Ariel U.S., LLC, Does -10, inclusive, Nir Algazy and others
Plaintiff:
Konad Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Institutional Investor LLC v. Nomura International PLC et al
as 1:2017cv04865
Plaintiff:
Institutional Investor LLC
Defendant:
Nomura International PLC, Sylvestor Osei and Liz Atkin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Institutional Investor, LLC v. Nomura International PLC et al
as 1:2017cv04556
Plaintiff:
Institutional Investor, LLC
Defendant:
Nomura International PLC, Liz Atkin and Sylvestor Osei
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Serendip LLC v. Atkin
as 1:2016cv08790
Plaintiff:
Serendip LLC
Defendant:
Hugh Murray Atkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MJD Marketing, Inc. v. Atkins et al
as 8:2014cv01998
Plaintiff:
MJD Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Debra J. Atkins, M.D., John Frodel, M.D. and Atlanta Medical Day Spa and Surgery Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
