Cases 31 - 40 of 53
ATKINS v. FOSTER
as 1:2012cv01155
Defendant:
KELVIN DONNELL ATKINS
Respondent:
RUDY FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ATKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv01095
Petitioner:
KELVIN DONNELL ATKINS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ATKINSON, et al v. OMTRON USA, LLC
as 1:2011cv00910
Plaintiff:
KENT ATKINSON , RHONDA ATKINSON , RODNEY BROWN and others
Defendant:
OMTRON USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURGESS v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
EBAY, INC., PAYPAL, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaev v. Lance, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
David Shaev
Defendant:
Lance, Inc., David V. Singer, W.J. Prezzano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
RES-NC Settlers Edge, LLC et al vs Settlers Edge Holding Company, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
RES-NC Settlers Edge, LLC
Defendant:
Settlers Edge Holding Company, LLC, Mountain Air Development Corporation, Virginia M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bailey v. Parker et al
as 1:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Bailey
Defendant:
John C. Parker, David Petty, Freddie Euten and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. O'Conner et al
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Bailey
Defendant:
Jack O'Conner, Freddie Euten, John C. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. O'Conner et al
as 1:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kevin McArthur Bailey
Defendant:
Jack O'Conner, Freddie Euten, John C. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Poindexter et al
as 3:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A., John G. Stumpf, James M. Strother and others
Defendant:
Luisa E. Poindexter and Carnis F. Poindexter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
