Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Murray v. Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv05360
Plaintiff:
Keasya Murray
Defendant:
Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC a Domestic Limited Liability Company doing business as T.G.I. Friday's and Jackmont Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01002
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arnett v. Warden, FCI Atlanta
as 1:2026cv05334
Petitioner:
Jason D. Arnett
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kelly v. Atlanta Independent School System et al
as 1:2026cv05261
Plaintiff:
Tatianna M. Kelly
Defendant:
Atlanta Independent School System, Ronald Applin, Timya Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
