Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01458
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ingram IV v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Ingram IV
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Hughes, III v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-5115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Hughes, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission and Michael Carvajal, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Reyes v. Neal
as 21-2615
Petitioner:
Jose Mauricio Reyes
Respondent:
Jean King, Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Garry D. Malphrus, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Edward F. Kelly, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Neil Fagan v. United States of America, et al
as 21-13524
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL SEAN FAGAN and NEIL SEAN DEHANEY FAGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEWART DC WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
