Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00815
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00993
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 6:2020cv06561
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Massaly v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Diane L. Witte, Attorney General William P. Barr, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Victor Jerry Massaly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis-Martinez v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Rebecca Adducci, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Jared Solis-Martinez
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rodriguez Cabrera v. Crawford et al
as 1:2019cv01604
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, US Attorney General William P. Barr, Timothy S. Robbins and others
Petitioner:
Mr. Melvin Josue Rodriguez Cabrera
Reeves v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Secretary Unknown, Attorney General William P. Barr, Stanley Crocket and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Clovis Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
