Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Matthews v. Cameron et al
as 3:2012cv01759
Petitioner:
Thomas Harvey Matthews
Respondent:
Cameron and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamey v. Coleman et al
as 3:2012cv01643
Petitioner:
Donald L. Lamey, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Coleman, District Attorney of Centre County and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCUTELLA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Letterlough v. Varano et al
as 3:2012cv01423
Petitioner:
Samuel Letterlough
Respondent:
David Varano, DA of Dauphin County and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinkley v. Varano et al
as 3:2012cv01254
Petitioner:
Randy Carl Hinkley
Respondent:
David Varano, PA Board of Probation and Parole, Lehigh County Clerk of Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Desarden v. McGrady et al
as 3:2012cv01134
Petitioner:
Jay Angel Desarden
Respondent:
James McGrady and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
La Forest v. Attorney General of PA et al
as 3:2012cv00984
Petitioner:
Corey La Forest
Respondent:
Attorney General of PA and Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ball v. Dinges et al
as 3:2012cv00894
Petitioner:
Kyion Ball
Respondent:
Michael A. Dinges and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood v. Keen et al
as 3:2012cv00584
Petitioner:
Ryheeme R. Wood
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCann v. Attorney General of PA et al
as 3:2012cv00294
Petitioner:
Wayne E. McCann
Respondent:
Attorney General of PA, Wayne County Correctional Facility and SCI Waymart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
