Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Mejia, et al. v. Jaddou, et al.
as 23-4345
Plaintiff / Appellant: VITO MEJIA and THELMA MEJIA
Defendant / Appellee: UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 5, inclusive
Rochon v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01243
Plaintiff: Paul E Rochon
Defendant: Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice, Western District of Washington Clerk and Deputy Clerk, Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and others
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Plamen Trifonov v. Jack Fox, et al
as 14-35762
Petitioner - Appellant: PLAMEN VLADIMIROV TRIFONOV
Respondent - Appellee: JACK FOX, Warden Federal Detention Center Seatac in his Official Capacity and his successors and assigns, DAVID Y. MILLER, U.S. Marshal, U.S. Marshals Services, Western District of Washington ast Seattle, and his successors and assigns, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, in his Official Capacity and his successors and assigns and others
Dayan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00406
Plaintiff: Edward Dayan
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant: RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?