Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Sprouse v. Leal et al
as 5:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Texas Attorney General's Office, Tiffany N. Leal and Sammy M. McCrary
Plaintiff:
Brandon W. Sprouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Texas Attorney General Office et al
as 4:2018mc02241
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Waters
Defendant:
Texas Attorney General Office, Harris County District Attorney Office, Texas Dept Of Public Safety and others
Alishia Morris v. City of Lubbock Home Inspector, et al
as 18-10556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALISHIA N. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LUBBOCK HOME INSPECTORS, LUBBOCK COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, "Attorney Generals Office" and others
Jeremy Mundine v. Dorthy Kirschvick, et al
as 17-20763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY MUNDINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORTHY W. KIRSCHVICK, CURTIS BRIDGES, BENITO MOYA and others
Mundine v. Kirschvick et al
as 4:2017cv03380
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mundine
Defendant:
Dorthy W. Kirschvick, Curtis Bridges, Benito Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobos v. Potter et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant:
Gary Potter, John W Smith, Robert Junell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. 231st Judicial District Court et al
as 4:2016cv00999
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Stewart
Respondent:
231st Judicial District Court, Texas Attorney General Office and Harry Stewart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cameron v. The City of Dallas, Texas et al
as 6:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Cameron
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas, Texas Judicial Courts and Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamar Porter
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and Attorney General Office State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
