Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Alifante v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Alifante Augustus and Augustus Alifante
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MCKOY v. USA
as 1:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
RAMESE AUGUSTUS MCKOY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Adams et al v. 4520 Corp Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Augustus A Adams and Diane Adams
Defendant:
4520 Corp Inc, 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Karolina Sorensson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Augustus Willis, IV, Donald Newman & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Felton et al v. Albemarle Regional Health Services et al
as 2:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Donald W. Overby, Joshua H. Stein, Augustus B. Elkins and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Felton and Arthur Felton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Smith et al
as 5:2019ct03222
Defendant:
Arbitrator Shirley, Jason Smith, M. Weiss and others
Plaintiff:
Sug M. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeborn v. MaxPoint Interactive, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Anthony Freeborn
Defendant:
MaxPoint Interactive, Inc., Joseph Epperson, Kevin Dulsky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Berg v. MaxPoint Interactive, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
MaxPoint Interactive, Inc., Joseph Epperson, Kevin Dulsky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MCKOY v. USA
as 1:2017cv00514
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RAMESE AUGUSTUS MCKOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUDSON II BEY v. COOPER et al
as 1:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE AUGUSTUS HUDSON II BEY
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, TERRY MCAULIFFE and TOM WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
