Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pospisil v. WTA Tour, Inc.
as 26-3112
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED, ALL ENGLAND LAWN TENNIS CLUB (CHAMPIONSHIPS) LIMITED, FEDERATION FRANCAISE DE TENNIS and others
Plaintiff:
INGRID NEEL, CHRISTIAN HARRISON, MARCO TRUNGELLITI and others
Aristocrat Interactive S.a r.l et al v. New Starbreeze Publishing AB et al
as 2:2026cv03573
Plaintiff:
Aristocrat Interactive S.a r.l, Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Technologies Australia Pty. LTD. and others
Defendant:
New Starbreeze Publishing AB, Starbreeze USA, Inc. and StarBreeze LA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chubb Insurance Australia Limited v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
as 4:2026cv12562
Plaintiff:
Chubb Insurance Australia Limited
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Nasir v. Equinix, Inc., et al.
as 26-6947
Plaintiff:
SAJJAD NASIR, I
Defendant:
EQUINIX, INC., named as Equinix-DC, Inc. 2210584, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, LTD. and CHINA UNITED NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CO., LTD.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd et al v. American Entertainment Services Inc et al
as 1:2026cv01945
Plaintiff:
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
American Entertainment Services, Inc. and Ken Grothmann
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd et al v. Big Daddy Games LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01940
Plaintiff:
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Big Daddy Games, LLC, Amusement Devices, Inc. and Eric Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Nasir v. China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd., et al.
as 26-6831
Plaintiff:
SAJJAD NASIR, I
Defendant:
CHINA UNITED NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CO., LTD., named as China Unicom, Industrial Complex, NON-SDN Chinese Military, EQUINIX, INC., Digital Infrastructure Corporation, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, LTD., Financial Banking Institution, NAB and others
Psychwire Australia Pty Ltd v. Ifland et al
as 2:2026cv03855
Plaintiff:
Psychwire Australia Pty Ltd
Defendant:
Joan Ifland, Food Addiction Reset, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Satish Dat Beast v. Murdoch
as 26-2504
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, The Greatest Recording Artist of All Time Who is The Closest to Prince Rogers Nelson and Lenny Kravitz and Who Exclusively Does Business with the Most Powerful Name in Entertainment Vevo as a Joint Venture of Universal Music Grou
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, Fox News/ Australia, (The Most Despised Man in Australia Despised by Malcolm Turnbull as Former Prime Minister and by British Government), MURDOCH FAMILY TRUST, FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION and others
Nasir v. Equinix, Inc., et al.
as 26-5732
Plaintiff:
SAJJAD NASIR, I
Defendant:
EQUINIX, INC., NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, LTD. and CHINA UNITED NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CO., LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
