Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rock v. GENUINE PARTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv05879
Plaintiff:
Shanequa Rock
Defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, NAPA Auto Parts and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Tajikkhaveh v. Genuine Parts Company, et al.
as 26-5099
Plaintiff:
SARAH TAJIKKHAVEH, an individual, Statutory Beneficiary
Defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, doing business as NAPA Auto Parts, RUSSELL THAD CLARK, an individual and NORTHEND AUTO PARTS, INC., a Georgia corporation
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv09400
Plaintiff:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Dianchen Auto Parts City
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
