Cases 1 - 10 of 828
Garcia-Avila, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2898
Petitioner:
MELVIN ALEXI GARCIA-AVILA, EDITHA DANIELA RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ANGELINE DARIANA GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Cerrato-Avila
as 24-1193
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DENNIS CERRATO-AVILA
Gamboa-Avila v. HHS
as 24-1765
Petitioner:
JOSE GAMBOA-AVILA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Perez Hernandez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2734
Plaintiff:
JESUS ANTONIO PEREZ HERNANDEZ and JUAN CARLOS VAZQUEZ AVILA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant LLC doing business as Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant and Alfonso Avila doing business as Chihuahua Mexican Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Santiago-Tito, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2322
Petitioner:
ELVIS IVAN SANTIAGO-TITO, SMITH JEAMPIER SANTIAGO-QUISPE, JUAN CARLOS SANTIAGO-TITO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Avila-Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-60175
Petitioner:
Francisca Marisela Avila-Ortiz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Avila-Vintimilla v. Garland
as 24-939
Petitioner:
JULIO AVILA-VINTIMILLA, ARACELY AVILA-AVILA, ALEXA AVILA-AVILA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vidal Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1851
Petitioner:
LUIS HERNANDO VIDAL ESCOBAR, LUISA BIBIANA AVILA CALDERON, LAIA SALOME VIDAL AVILA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
