Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Neal v. Demaroney
as 23-10889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal
Defendant / Appellee:
April Demaroney, Captain of Correctional Officer, Terry Raines, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Jason Hardegree, Assistant Warden and others
Steve Riddick v. C. Mullens
as 23-6636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MULLENS, UNIT MANAGER LARRY COLLINS, SGT. B. BARNETTE and others
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barganski v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Barganski
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bill Rusk
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yazdi v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Yazdi
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tupper v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
John Tupper
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
