Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Isaac Williams v. Alabama Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-10221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PHILLIP GUTHERY, COI, St Clair Correctional Officer, B. CHAPMAN, COI, St Clair Correctional Officer and others
:
SERVICE
CHAPMAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66685
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO., CAPE INSULATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jemison v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Richard Allen, David Wise, Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv63141
Plaintiff:
ALFORD B. CHAPMAN, ALFORD B. CHAPMAN and ALFORD B. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DRILLING SPECIALTIES COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Alford B. Chapman v. Phillips 66 Co., et al.
as MSS/1:08-CV-00984
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Co
Plaintiff:
Alford B. Chapman
Donny B. Chapman v. International Paper Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-85046
Plaintiff:
Donny B. Chapman
Defendant:
International Paper Co
Ford v. Wise et al
as 4:2008cv01609
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
D. Wise, Deborah Gardner, B Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Peterson et al
as 4:2008cv01608
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
Peterson, Edna Byers, J. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Sanders et al
as 4:2008cv01607
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
Carl Sanders, C . O'Brian, D. Wise and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
