Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(HC)Silva v. Moss
as 2:2026cv02520
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Silva
Respondent:
Gerald Moss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moss v. Hicks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00584
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moss
Defendant:
Sergant Hicks and Ventress Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRELL et al v. REDDICK MOSS, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08938
Plaintiff:
MARYANN FARRELL
Defendant:
REDDICK MOSS, LLC, MCELDREW PURTELL, ESQS., IAN T. NORRIS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Glenn v. Delvin et al
as 3:2026cv01458
Plaintiff:
Paige Marie Glenn
Defendant:
Jennifer Delvin and Cassandra Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Moss
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC and First American Title Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Raven v. The City of Elmira
as 26-1873
Plaintiff:
JULIAN MARCUS RAVEN
Defendant:
CITY OF ELMIRA, Mayor DANIEL J. MANDELL, in his official capacity, COREY COOKE and others
Sutton v. Wilson County Government et al
as 3:2026cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ramona Sutton
Defendant:
Wilson County Government and Debbie Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
