Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Watts v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03431
Plaintiff:
Robert Watts
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Pinkston v. Reeves, et al
as 3:2026cv00755
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Nathan "Burl" Cain, John Hunt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Target Corporation
as 4:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Watts
Defendant:
Target Corporation d/b/a Super Target and/or Target Store #2145
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Watt v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03242
Plaintiff:
Zachary Watt
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ashley et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv03982
Plaintiff:
Joy Ashley, Clover Crest Farms, Inc., Mark Foster and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., JBS, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Watt v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01708
Plaintiff:
Zachary Watt
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gilmore v. WATTS et al
as 2:2026cv02036
Plaintiff:
Mark Gilmore
Defendant:
DARRELL WATTS, CORE LABORATORIES, LP, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Trustee:
Keisha Jackson
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Graham v. Watts
as 1:2026cv00908
Plaintiff:
DiSean Graham
Defendant:
LT. A. Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watt v. Stroudt
as 2:2026cv01533
Petitioner:
Delaney K Watt
Respondent:
Paula Stroudt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 5:2026cv02399
Plaintiff:
Rachel K Watts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
