Cases 1 - 10 of 6,097
Garcia v. NES Global, LLC
as 1:2024cv11187
Plaintiff:
Efren Garcia
Defendant:
NES Global, LLC d/b/a NES Fircroft
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera Samayoa v. Garland
as 24-1432
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ARMANDO RIVERA SAMAYOA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Sidman
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff:
PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Cross Defendant:
CHARLES SIDMAN
Defendant:
BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Escobar Larin v. Garland
as 24-1428
Petitioner:
JOSE RODOLFO ESCOBAR LARIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kolackovsky et al v. Town of Rockport
as 1:2024cv11139
Plaintiff:
Mr. John T. Kolackovsky, Mr. Zenas B. Seppala, Ms. Anne Hyde and others
Defendant:
Town of Rockport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Herb Chambers of Auburn, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
as 4:2024cv40065
Plaintiff:
Herb Chambers of Auburn, Inc. d/b/a Herb Chambers Hyundai of Auburn
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sosa et al v. 28Freight LLC d/b/a Truck Courier
as 4:2024cv40064
Plaintiff:
Claudio Sosa, Luis Aguilar and Cristian Lamarque
Defendant:
28Freight LLC d/b/a Truck Courier and Richard Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US Department of Labor, Acting Secretary of Labor v. Ulster Property Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC d/b/a ULSTER PROPERTY SERVICES and Kieran Rice
Xiquin Xirum, et al v. Garland
as 24-1413
Petitioner:
JACINTO XIQUIN XIRUM and BARTOLA ROMERO SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
