Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Alan Longstaff v. Dixon Company, et al
as 09-56060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN LONGSTAFF, DBA Alan Longstaff Masonry Co.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIXON COMPANY, a California company, DBA B Dixon Company, Inc. and ARCH REINSURANCE COMPANY
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 2:2009mc00016
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Donald Anthony Walker Young et al
as 2:2009mc00193
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capital Management, LLC, Acorn II, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walker Young et al
as 3:2009mc00025
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capital Management, LLC, Acorn II, L.P. and others
Walters Wholesale Electric Co v. B. Dixon Company, et al
as 2:2008cv00921
Plaintiff:
Walters Wholesale Electric Co and Walters Wholesale Electric Co
Defendant:
B. Dixon Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc v. B. Dixon Company et al
as 2:2007cv00767
Plaintiff:
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc
Defendant:
B. Dixon Company and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
RCB and Sons Inc v. B Dixon Company et al
as 5:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
RCB and Sons Inc and RCB and Sons Inc
Defendant:
B Dixon Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
