Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Benjamin v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01991
Defendant:
Guy Beneventano, Joseph A. Crucillo, Stephen B. Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
George Charles Benjamin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06602
Plaintiff:
DWYAINE B. EDWARDS
Defendant:
DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL USA, INC. , MARMAXX OPERATING CORPORATION and TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Cross_claimant:
DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.
Cross_defendant:
MARMAXX OPERATING CORPORATION and TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv02140
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Edwards and Patricia Edwards
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Edwards
as 1:2011cv01519
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael B. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
EDWARDS et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80605
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B EDWARDS and MYRA M EDWARDS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. RUSTIN
as 2:2009cv01358
Petitioner:
ROBERT B. EDWARDS
Respondent:
RAMON C. RUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TEKsystems, Inc. v. Edwards et al
as 1:2009cv01886
Plaintiff:
TEKsystems, Inc., TEKsystems, Inc. and TEKsystems, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott B. Edwards, Michael P. Kern, Scott D. Misal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ASSOCIATES IN FEMALE HEALTH CARE, P.A. et al v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2008cv06208
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATES IN FEMALE HEALTH CARE, P.A.
Defendant:
URSULA B. EDWARDS-OSBORNE
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
URSULA B. EDWARDS
ThirdParty Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
