Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Howard v. Roberts
as 3:2019cv00259
Defendant:
B. J. Roberts
Plaintiff:
James C Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Roberts et al
as 3:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Milton Brown
Defendant:
B. J. Roberts and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Stacy Curry
Defendant:
B. J. Roberts and Ded Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Paternoster-Cozart v. Bob McCabe
as 17-6189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA PATERNOSTER-COZART
Respondent - Appellee:
BOB MCCABE, Acting Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Defendant:
HAMPTON CIRCUIT COURT, LINDA SMITH, Clerk, HAMPTON SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
Newkirk v. Gregg et al
as 3:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Artisha Gregg, Huff, Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Chandler v. B. J. Robert
as 14-6138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. CHANDLER
Defendant - Appellee:
B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff
Defendant:
GEORGE M. ROGERS, III, Attorney at Law and ANTHON BELL, Commonwealth Attorney
Yisra'EL v. §Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 4:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Yahmassiach Ben Levi Yisra'EL
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Louis R. Lerner, E. Preston Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Rogers et al
as 1:2013cv01115
Plaintiff:
William L. Chandler
Defendant:
George M. Rogers, III, Anthon Bell and B. J. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Bland v. B. Robert
as 12-1671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY BLAND, DANIEL RAY CARTER, JR., DAVID W. DIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
B. J. ROBERTS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Hampton, Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
