Cases
Mabel Jones v. Prince George's County, Maryla We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant: MABEL S. JONES, individually and as the next best friend and personal representative of the estate of Prince Carmen Jones, Sr.
Intervenor/Plaintiff - None: CANDACE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and CARLTON B. JONES, Officer, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities
Defendant - None: ALEXANDRE BAILEY and JOHN S. FARRELL
Movant - None: INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, ROBERT F. HORAN, J. THOMAS MANGER and others
Randy Valentine v. D. Richardson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6242
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDY L. VALENTINE
Defendant - Appellee: D. RICHARDSON, Officer, LIEUTENANT PRESSLY, R. GOINS, Officer and others
Defendant - None: NURSE GAY, LEGESSE TEBEJE, M.D., NURSE JUDY and others
Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George Cty, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 02-7104
Plaintiff - Appellee: Mabel S. Jones, Individually, as the next best friend of, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Carmen Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: Prince George's County, Maryland, John S. Farrell, Chief of Police, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities, Carlton B. Jones, Officer, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities and others
Terminated Party: Robert F. Horan, Commonwealth's Attorney for Fairfax County and J. Thomas Manger
Movant - Appellant: Prince Carmen Jones, Sr., individually and as co-legal custodian of Nina Amayye Eden Chi Jones, a minor and Candace Jackson, mother and next friend, and individually and as co-legal custodian of Nina Amayee Eden Chi Jones (Nina Jones), a minor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?