Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Majestic Care Center et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teddie B Jones and Teddie Jones
Defendant:
Majestic Care Center, David Early, Mike Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
LORI B. JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woods et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Myshira Woods and Demetri Woods
Defendant:
Latasha Richardson, Kathryn Malon, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
CROSS v. EASTON et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. CROSS
Defendant:
J. EASTON, D. HOLIAN, T. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Chain-O-Lakes IDOC
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Lowell B Jones
Defendant:
Chain-O-Lakes IDOC and Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CHAIN-O-LAKES IDOC
as 1:2016cv03028
Defendant:
CHAIN-O-LAKES IDOC
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Indy City of et al
as 1:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teddie B Jones
Defendant:
Indy City of, Fort Wayne City and Richard Stoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Foxhollow Technologies Inc
as 2:2008cv00363
Plaintiff:
David B Jones, David B Jones, David B Jones and others
Defendant:
Foxhollow Technologies Inc and Foxhollow Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
