Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Le Clerc, Sr. v. Kuiper
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
B.J. Kuiper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dantin v. Lee County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
B.J. Dantin
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Oxendine et al
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Charles Watkins
Defendant:
James W. Oxendine, B.J. Bernstein, Richard Coleman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chiron Recovery Center, LLC et al v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80766
Plaintiff:
B.L., an individual, D.R., an individual, A.A., an individual and others
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Sorensen Companies, Inc. v. B.J. Burns Incorporated
as 3:2017cv01095
Petitioner:
Sorensen Companies, Inc.
Respondent:
B.J. Burns Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
USA v. Marc Monestine
as 16-10530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC KENLO MONESTINE, a.k.a. B.J.
Robinson et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Scelia Robinson and Zack Lyde
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Amity House, Jeffrey Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meritan Dumel v. Capt. B.J. Elvin, et al
as 13-12000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERITAN DUMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPT. B.J. ELVIN, LT. A. COLEMAN, WARDEN and others
Dumel v. Elvin et al
as 2:2013cv14006
Plaintiff:
Meritan Dumel
Defendant:
B.J. Elvin, A. Coleman, P. Skipper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. RLJ-McLarty-Landers Automotive Holdings, LLC
as 2:2012cv03828
Plaintiff:
Billy (B.J.) Carpenter
Defendant:
RLJ-McLarty-Landers Automotive Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
