Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B.T. v. Keith Battle
as 21-10318
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BATTLE, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant:
B.T., a minor, by and through his mother and as next friend Wanda Jackson
B.T. v. Battle et al
as 1:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
B.T.
Defendant:
Keith Battle , Felipe Usury , Carlos Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
John Doe 1 et al v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv80248
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , Jane Doe #1 , John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Moe Corporations 1-10, Moes 11-25 and others
Movant:
John E. Hall, Eric Holder, Jr., James Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.T. v. Battle et al
as 1:2017cv00917
Plaintiff:
B.T.
Defendant:
Keith Battle , Felipe Usury, Carlos Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Shaw et al
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert C. Shaw, Rose O. Shaw, Saint Andrews Ivy, B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
C.T. et al v. John Does 1 - 3
as 0:2014cv61283
Plaintiff:
C.T , L.T. and B.T.
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 3
Cause Of Action: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC v. Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD
as 1:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Walker Motor Company, Beine Automotive of Southwest Missouri, LLC, Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD. and Global Vehicles U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
