Cases 1 - 10 of 677
Bailey v. Berryman et al
as 6:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tammy Tracy Bailey
Defendant:
Scott Berryman, Cindy Tillbett, Derksen Portable Buildings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey, M.D. et al v. EMI Health
as 4:2024cv04232
Petitioner:
Jason Bailey, M.D. and Lone Star Surgical Partners, P.A.
Respondent:
EMI Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fredenburg et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Bailey Fredenburg and Jeffery Fredenburg
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. and CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hines v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv02540
Defendant:
Kerry Crews, NFN Bailey, Shift Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallett v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00129
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-129-O and Bailey Jones
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bailey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00392
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Ellis Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Bailey v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv03256
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Bailey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
