Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Cage v. Ballard et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cage
Defendant:
Christopher Ballard and The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
LaDyon Jones
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Lauren Milton and Courtney Chainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Outlaw Unlimited, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04711
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Outlaw Unlimited, LLC d/b/a Johnny B's Outlaw Saloon and Johnny Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hicks v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Colt A. Hicks
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Courtney Chaney, Jennifer Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Ballard
as 3:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Colt A. Hicks
Defendant:
Ben Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe et al v. Tomlinson et al
as 2:2023cv06539
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Monroe and Germaine Monroe
Defendant:
Trisura Specialty Insurance Company, Michael Tomlinson, Ballard Northern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
