Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jenkins v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
Clevon Jenkins
Defendant:
Officer PATRICK BANNING, OFFICER SCOTT SCHWEIZER, Officer MICHAEL SZELAGOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippen v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01550
Defendant:
Officer PATRICK BANNING, Officer SCOTT SCHWEIZER, Officer ERIK PROSS and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pippen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lawrence and Edward Fountain
Defendant:
PATRICK BANNING, ERIK PROSS, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BANNING et al
as 2:2020cv05442
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN/JANE DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-15 and PATRICK BANNING
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WESTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MELLOW et al
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MAMMIE MELLOW and MELLON BAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS et al
as 2:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRACTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2015cv01517
Petitioner:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent:
BARAK OBAMA and BAN KI-MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
