Cases 21 - 30 of 1,247
PALAMERICAN SECURITY, INC. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
PALAMERICAN SECURITY, INC.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
In re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023cv01014
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
SHABAZZ v. DIGGS et al
as 2:2023cv12046
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
ROBERT RZA DIGGS, SCOTT WHITELEATHER, ROBERT IGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Mosley v. Bank of America, et al
as 23-2497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, BRIAN YOUNG, Epic Settlement Manager and KENNETH BEMAH, Bank of America Manager
SHABAZZ v. BRIAN MOYNIHAN BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv07321
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
BRIAN MOYNIHAN BANK OF AMERICA and GARY "GZA" GRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILIOTE v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILIOTE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN and others
Eran Rubinstein, et al v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 23-2410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ANN M. GOLIO and others
Defendant:
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP US INC
In Re: Request from Buenos Aires, Argentina
as 1:2023cv00882
Petitioner:
The United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Mexico
as 1:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
