Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 77
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRICOME v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05614
Plaintiff: DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant: EBAY, INC. and BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv03476
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, M. FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. HAAZ et al
as 2:2015cv03474
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: SAM HAAZ, DAVID C. SHUTER, PERRY DEMARCO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. RIKER et al
as 2:2015cv03388
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: DEREK RIKER, SETH WILLIAMS, ELLEN T. GREENLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv03266
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: RAYFORD A. MEANS, MCKINLEY, MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAILL v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2015cv00142
Plaintiff: BILLY RAY NAILL
Defendant: BARACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MR. WENTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?