Cases 11 - 20 of 29
DAY v. DANIELS
as 2:2015cv00154
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS and BARACK OBAMA
Petitioner:
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANGELIQUE et al v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
ALL CHILDREN CURRENTLY IN FOSTER CARE IN THE U.S. and JESSICA ANGELIQUE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, BARACK OBAMA, STATE GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01353
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suess v. Obama et al
as 4:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Theresa J Suess
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIANA, BARACK OBAMA and SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEITH JUDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BILLINGS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv01829
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and BARACK OBAMA
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUGHES v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA, JENNIFER A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v OBAMA et al
as 1:2012mc00027
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA and ZINK
NORINGTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER EDWIN G. BUSS, GOVERNOR MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
