Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14458
Defendant:
RAS BARAKA, NYPD, FBI NEWARK and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMM v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2015cv01517
Petitioner:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent:
BARAK OBAMA and BAN KI-MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOSS v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE WORLD et al
as 2:2014cv01269
Plaintiff:
LESTER RAYMOND DOSS
Defendant:
THE INHABITANTS OF THE WORLD, BARAK OBAMA, CITIZENS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELNICK v. THE WHITE HOUSE, USA et al
as 5:2014cv02855
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JEFFREY MELNICK
Defendant:
PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA and THE WHITE HOUSE, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NADEAU v. NADEAU et al
as 2:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN NADEAU
Defendant:
DAVID LAWRENCE NADEAU, PAUL NADEAU, GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bayard v. Romey et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
Mitt Romey, Newt Gingrich, Andrew Brietbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BITON et al v. UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
as 2:2011cv05106
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DWECK, ADRIANNE MAIDENBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS et al v. BUSH et al
as 2:2008cv01129
Plaintiff:
ART WALTERS, COUNSEL TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE and FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMITTEE
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
