Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Price, Darnell v. Hannula, Joan et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Darnell Price
Defendant:
Dr. Joan Hannula, Jamie Barker, Jean Felber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAVEZ v. DOURGTHY et al
as 1:2023cv01836
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEJUAN CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CHRIS DOURGTHY and SARAH BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evans et al v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2023cv04248
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Evans and Kenya Evans
Defendant:
County of Lake, Lake County Sheriff Correctional Facility, John Idleburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crone, Jr., Myron v. Village of Webster et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Myron Crone, Jr.
Defendant:
Village of Webster, Noah Barker and Anthony Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tricoci v. Vidljinovic et al
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Vincenzo Tricoci
Defendant:
Steven Vidljinovic, Patrick Barker, Brendan McCrudden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DEBOARD v. ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Defendant:
ZINKAN ENTERPRISES I, LLC and ZINKAN & BARKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Reese v. Krones Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Michael F Reese, Sr
Defendant:
Krones Inc, Mark Doolittle, John Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ATKINS v. SYKES et al
as 1:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE S. SYKES, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
