Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Michel v. Barroso et al
as 3:2023cv06626
Plaintiff:
Ramon Michel
Defendant:
J. Barroso and J. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bess v. Barroso et al
as 3:2023cv06095
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Bess
Defendant:
J. Barroso, J. Martinez and R. Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2023cv03584
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
CDCR, California Correctional Health Care Services, J. Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barroso v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston and Wren Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00236
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barroso v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston and Wren Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Johndell Henderson
Defendant:
Michael Thomas, Herman Clavijo, Pedro Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Foss et al
as 3:2020cv03857
Defendant:
P. Stevenson, Sargeant Barroso, Christy Tange and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Reynoso et al
as 4:2020cv00906
Defendant:
R Reynoso, M. Barroso and M. Cervantes
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cleveland v. Reynoso et al
as 1:2020cv00154
Defendant:
R. Reynoso, M. Barroso and M. Cervantes
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
