Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Neal Technologies Incorporated v. Baxter Auto LLC
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies Incorporated doing business as Bullet Proof Diesel
Defendant:
Baxter Auto LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Wilkie, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00382
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Sostenes Joseph Flores, Robert Wilkie and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tillman v. Everett et al
as 3:2019cv08231
Defendant:
Universal Logistics Holdings Incorporated, Specialized Rail Services Incorporated, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Earnesto Tillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bey v. Glendale City Court et al
as 2:2019cv04538
Defendant:
Jean Baxter, Glendale City Court and Kenneth Johnston
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wali Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamez v. Cochise County Adult Probation Department et al
as 4:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Cave Radio 97.7FM, Randy Beel, Michele Beel and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. Airstream Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01152
Plaintiff:
Robert W Baxter, Jr.
Defendant:
Airstream Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Baxter #253714 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jack L Baxter
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
