Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories Inc v. Anatek Labs Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eurofins Microbiology Labratories Inc
Defendant:
Anatek Labs Inc and Kyle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kent School District v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kent School District
Defendant:
JUUL Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tuttle et al v. Audiophile Music Direct Inc
as 2:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Tuttle, Dustin Collman and Stephen J Tuttle
Defendant:
Audiophile Music Direct, Inc. doing business as Music Direct doing business as Mobile Fidelity doing business as Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab doing business as MoFi, Audiophile Music Direct Inc doing business as Music Direct doing business as Mobile Fidelity doing business as Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab doing business as MoFi and Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Adam Stiles, Omar Flores and Gregory Bitterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tulalip Tribes v. JUUL Labs Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Tulalip Tribes
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hepworth v. Wyze Labs Inc
as 2:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Bree Hepworth
Defendant:
Wyze Labs Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
JUUL Labs Inc and SUDHAR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JUUL Labs Inc v. Sudhar Corporation
as 3:2021cv05549
Plaintiff:
JUUL Labs Inc
Defendant:
Sudhar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Wyze Labs Inc v. Beijing Rockrobo Technology Co Ltd et al
as 2:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
Wyze Labs Inc
Defendant:
Beijing Rockrobo Technology Co Ltd and Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
