Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Jemmott et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Alene Elene Beasley
Defendant:
Sherlan Stanley Jemmott, J&J Trucking Enterprises, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dennis Long
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, DW McFarland, Lt. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beasley
as 1:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Jaramus Sharrod Jackson
Respondent:
Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MCKISSIC v. RAWLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
C RAWLING, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. BEASLEY et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JEROME JACKSON and Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, M.D. John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Victor D. Nash
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Beasley, Willesha Warren, Michael Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BEASLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JEROME JACKSON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
