Cases 21 - 30 of 244
ELDER v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00337
Defendant:
BOBBIE RIGGS, DANIEL BEDWELL, BARBRA and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. ELDER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
BRYCE POPE
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, BEDWELL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILLMORE, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
BYRD, BOBBIE RIGGS and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAMARRON v. CENTURION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE ZAMARRON
Defendant:
CENTURION, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SNOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWN, DANIEL BEDWELL, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
