Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Bel Air Lighting, Inc. v. Progressive Lighting
as 10-12844
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEL AIR LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
Progressive Lighting v. Lowe's Home Centers, et al
as 10-11687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC., a Georgia Corporation, d.b.a. Savoy House
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. and BEL AIR LIGHTING, INC.
Evergreen Enterprises, Inc. v. Bel Air Lighting, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00402
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Bel Air Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
L.D. Kichler Co. v. Bel Air Lighting, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
L.D. Kichler Co. and L.D. Kichler Co.
Defendant:
Bel Air Lighting, Inc. and Trans Globe Imports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Bel Air Lighting, Inc. v. Progressive Lighting, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02822
Plaintiff:
Bel Air Lighting, Inc., Bel Air Lighting, Inc. and Bel Air Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Progressive Lighting, Inc., Progressive Lighting, Inc., Progressive Lighting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Bel Air Lighting Inc v. Progressive Lighting Inc
as 2:2007cv05616
Plaintiff:
Bel Air Lighting Inc, Bel Air Lighting Inc and Bel Air Lighting Inc
Defendant:
Progressive Lighting Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Juno Lighting, Inc. et al v. Bel Air Lighting, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03113
Plaintiff:
Juno Lighting, Inc., Juno Lighting, Inc., Juno Lighting, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bel Air Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Haggerty Enterprises Inc v. Bel Air Lighting Inc
as 2:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Haggerty Enterprises Inc and Haggerty Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Bel Air Lighting Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
