Cases 1 - 10 of 721
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarkar v. City of New York
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
JAY SARKAR
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION FOR THE NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06259
Plaintiff:
Jesse L Bello
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Respondent:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, Ajide Technology Corporation, et al v. USA
as 4:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, Ajide Technology Corporation and Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
BERRY v. AKANDE et al
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
MARQUESE BERRY
Defendant:
AKANDE, JAIL COMMANDER, ADEOJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. USA
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar #118162 v. Petrova et al
as 2:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Ralitsa Petrova, Unknown Kick, Unknown Bello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
