Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Bierwirth v. AII Acquisition Corporation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Defendant:
Alan MRO Supply Inc., Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. doing business as Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. formerly known as Statewide Industrial Equipment Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor by Merger to Sager-Spuck Supply Co., Inc., BW/IP International Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bierwirth and Gloria Bierwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Joan E. Quinn, et al v. Avco Corporation, et al
as 22-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN E. QUINN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Albert quinn, Deceased, JAMES ARNOLD QUINN, ELIZABETH QUINN and others
Defendant:
AVCO CORP, LYCOMING ENGINES, TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS INC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTINENTAL MOTORS INC
Chauvin v. ABB, Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Chauvin
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company, AK Steel Corporation, as successor-in-interest to National Supply, Albert L. Bossier, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Myrna Abril v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Myrna Abril, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Vicente Abril, Deceased and Myrna Abril
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Atwood & Morrill as Successor-in-Interest to Weir Valves and Controls USA Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcia Vanover v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VANOVER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID VANOVER, Deceased and Marica Vanover
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross Defendant:
Kohler, Co., Sid Harvey Industries Inc. and York International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Schwartz et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 8:2020cv01507
Cross Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber CO., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Raytheon Aircraft Co. and others
Respondent:
Honeywell International, Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Gregory Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schwartz et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2020cv08861
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Meggit Aircraft Braking Systems, Inc., CBS Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
George Schwartz, Theresa Schwartz and Gregory Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cope et al v. A.I.I Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Unimin Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Belac and Faith Belac Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Michel v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Victor Anthony Michel, Victor Michel, Keith Michel and others
Defendant:
Honeywell Int. Inc., as Successor in Interest to Bendix Corp., Crane Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
