Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Batchelor v. Fletcher-Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nadine Batchelor
Defendant:
Lawrence Fletcher-Hill, Marilyn Bentley, Circuit Court for Baltimore City and others
Green v. Bentley
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Green
Defendant:
Marilyn Bentley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pope v. Fletcher-Hill, et al.
as 1:2021cv02935
Plaintiff:
Ms. Mayner J. Pope
Defendant:
The Honorable Lawrence P. Fletcher-Hill, Ms Marilyn F. Bentley, Ms Abigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bentley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 8:2019cv03103
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Steven Bentley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendricks v. Cook et al
as 1:2019cv01674
Defendant:
John S. Nugent, Marilyn Bentley and Takirah Cook
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ronier Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rembold v. Reilly et al
as 1:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Sherri Hellmann, Clerk Julie L. Ensor, Barbara Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Rembold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Abdulmalik et al v. Marriott International Inc et al
as 8:2018cv03933
Plaintiff:
Brady Collins, Julie Davis, Jay Lockaby and others
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Eaton v. Guistwite et al
as 1:2018cv01757
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Eaton, Sr.
Defendant:
Kevin P. Guistwite, Baltimore City Office of Child Support Enforcement and Marilyn Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton v. Guistwite et al
as 1:2018cv01224
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Eaton, Sr.
Defendant:
Kevin P. Guistwite, Baltimore City Child Support Enforcement Office and Marilyn Bentley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
