Cases filed in Idaho
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff: Ronald Van Hook
Defendant: State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Petitioner: Camron Belcher
Respondent: Little, Richardson, Pattriccio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00478
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Van Hook v. Winmill, et al.
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff: Ronald Van Hook
Defendant: Judge Winmill, A.A and the Clerk's Office, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sileoni v. Bixby et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00008
Defendant: Baumgartner, Bixby, Boggs and others
Plaintiff: Maximiliano Sileoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Christianson et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant: C/P McDonald, Dr. Berri, Warden Christianson and others
Plaintiff: Alex David Tony Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant: Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff: Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant: Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff: Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Idaho Supreme Court
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff: Allen Berry
Defendant: Idaho Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Kirkham
as 1:2011cv00498
Respondent: Terry Kirkham
Petitioner: Richard Berry Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?