Cases 1 - 10 of 2,122
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Medney v. Hut 8 Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv21482
Plaintiff:
Matthew Medney
Defendant:
Hut 8 Corp., Bill Tai, Mike Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Key v. Brusseau
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Joy Key
Defendant:
Bill Brusseau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coney, Billy v. Judge William H. Hastie et al
as 1:2024cv21116
Plaintiff:
Billy Coney
Defendant:
Judge William H. Hastie, Donna L. Shalala, Centurion of Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ebony Washington
Defendant:
Sheriff Gordon Smith, Jared Mallard, Bill Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bills v. Dynamic Security, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Syimone Bills
Defendant:
Dynamic Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aliko v. Tai et al
as 1:2024cv20890
Plaintiff:
Wesley Aliko
Defendant:
Bill Tai, Asher Genoot, Alexia Hefti and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
