Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Amber Morales v. Paypal Credit
as 2:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Amber Morales
Defendant:
Paypal Credit and Bill Me Later, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sarah Lewis v. Bill Me Later, Inc., et al
as 5:2018cv00578
Defendant:
Bill Me Later, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lewis
Richard Mitchell v. Convergent Outsourcing Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv02409
Defendant:
Bill Me Later, Convergent Outsourcing Inc., Convergent Resources Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mitchell
Tovar v. Bill Me Later, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00713
Plaintiff:
Ramon Tovar
Defendant:
Bill Me Later, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Tovar v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv04421
Plaintiff:
Ramon Tovar
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and Bill Me Later, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv04416
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and Bill Me Later, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tatro v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01305
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc., T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Tatro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
