Cases 31 - 40 of 74
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
as 4:2015cv02404
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, IAM National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Gregory L. Armstrong, Al Swanson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Plains GP Holdings L.P., Harry N. Pefanis, Victor Burk and others
Petitioner:
Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc., The Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System, Houston Municipal Employees Pension System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Steck v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02129
Plaintiff:
Richard Steck
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. , Thomas G. Dundon , Jason Kulas and others
Movant:
Patrick Benard , Deka Investment GmbH and City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02512
Defendant:
Revance Therapeutics, Inc. , L. Daniel Browne , Lauren P. Silvernail and others
Plaintiff:
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elmachtoub, et al v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 15-1491
Plaintiff:
NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JAMES L. BURCH, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BRADLEY, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARVEY J. BERGER, FRANK G. HALUSKA and others
Defendant:
DAVID E. I. PYOTT, MIKE R. BOWLIN, JOHN T. CARDIS and others
Movant:
JOSEPH MASSAGLIA, KENNETH CANAWAY, ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M. B. H. and others
In re American Capital Realties Litigation
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
American Capital Realties Litigation, American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Arc Properties Operating Partnership L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund, Tiaa-Cref Equity Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
New York City Employees Retirement System et al v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
New York City Employees Retirement System , New York City Police Pension Fund , New York City Police Officers' Variable Supplements Fund and others
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., ARC Properties Operating Partnership, Nicholas S. Schorsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The City Of Tampa General Employees Retirement Fund v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10134
Plaintiff:
The City Of Tampa General Employees Retirement Fund
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Nicholas S. Schorsch, David S. Kay and others
Movant:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kumar v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03746
Plaintiff:
Karan Kumar and City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. , Thomas G. Dundon , Jason A. Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mehrotra v. Rocket Fuel Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv04114
Plaintiff:
Sanjiv Mehrotra
Defendant:
Rocket Fuel Inc., George H. John, J. Peter Bardwick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Steck v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06942
Plaintiff:
Richard Steck
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., Thomas G. Dundon, Jason Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
