Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Martin et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00792
Plaintiff:
Denny Martin and Bobbie Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv04176
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MARTIN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv01594
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MARTIN
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobby Martin v. USA
as 18-12337
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ALLEN et al v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 1:2018at00279
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MARTIN, SHIRLEY MORKAL, BRENT FARRIS and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambliss v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00569
Plaintiff:
James William Chambliss
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc and Bobby Martin Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United State of America v. Stroeker et al
as 4:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Blanca Stroeker, Bobbie Martin and Board of County Commissioners of Mayes County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martin v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv61848
Plaintiff:
Bobby Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Bobby Martin
as 16-14350
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY MARTIN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin et al v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2014cv08990
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Martin and Hazel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
