Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Martin v. Rygh et al
as 1:2022cv01321
Plaintiff: Bobby Martin
Defendant: James Rygh, . Seipp, Alexander Eddlemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Herring et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv81379
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant: Quancia Herring, Norris Fuse, Adam Ballau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Martin v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv04740
Petitioner: Bobby Martin
Respondent: United States of America and FCI Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bobby MartinIn re: Bobby Martin
as 22-12612
Petitioner: In re: BOBBY MARTIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bobby Martin v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv61339
Petitioner: Bobby Martin
Respondent: United States of America and FCI Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seal 1 v. USA
as 5:2020cv00173
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Bobby Martin Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36512
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: BOBBY MARTIN LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01388
Plaintiff: BOBBY MARTIN
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARIS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03136
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MARSHALL, BOBBY MARTIN, DAVID CALDWELL and others
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aris et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02106
Plaintiff: Michael Marshall, Bobby Martin, David Caldwell and others
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?