Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Kondaveeti v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2019cv02597
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Kishore Kondaveeti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammamy et al v. Boeing
as 1:2019cv02322
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Khaled El Hammamy and Atef Abdelsalam Hegazy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv01709
Plaintiff:
Yulita Sari
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 761
Nance v. Boeing Company
as 2:2018cv00988
Defendant:
Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Benjamin E Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chhen et al v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2018cv00779
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Ly Chhen , Jason Cogger , Charles Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tinmar Inc v. CNC Systems Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Tinmar Inc
Defendant:
Geoff Neely, CNC Systems Inc and Phillips Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Boeing Company and CamCad Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Boeing Company, et al v. KB Yuzhnoye, et al
as 18-55283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY and BOEING COMMERCIAL SPACE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
KB YUZHNOYE and PO YUZHNOYE MASHINOSTROITELNY ZAVOD
LB Surgery Center v. Boeing Company, et al
as 17-3491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LB SURGERY CENTER, doing business as GREATER LONG BEACH SURGERY CENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BOEING COMPANY, SCOTT BUCHANAN, HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, doing business as BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS and others
The Boeing Company v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv23824
Plaintiff:
The Boeing Company
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., Air Express International USA, Inc. and Air Express International USA, Inc. doing business as DHL Global Forwarding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MD Helicopters Incorporated v. Boeing Company
as 2:2017cv02598
Plaintiff:
MD Helicopters Incorporated
Defendant:
Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
