Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Philosophy, Inc. v. Baylis & Harding PLC et al
as 1:2014cv09892
Plaintiff:
Philosophy, Inc.
Defendant:
Baylis & Harding PLC and The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Gym-Mark, Inc et al v. Blueberry Blvd. LLC et al
as 3:2014cv05079
Plaintiff:
Gym-Mark, Inc and Gymboree Corporation, The
Defendant:
Blueberry Blvd. LLC , Kmart Corporation of Illinois, Inc. and Bon Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Ozwest, Inc. v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv01779
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., Boscov's Dept. Store, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ozwest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Wirt v. The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01755
Plaintiff:
Carrie E. Wirt
Defendant:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dermond Peterson Design LLC v. JLA Home Inc et al
as 2:2014cv06300
Defendant:
Amazon, Inc, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Belk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dermond Peterson Design LLC
Star Fabrics Inc. v. Bon-Ton Stores Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04863
Defendant:
Bon-Ton Stores Inc, Cejon Accessories Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc.
Star Fabrics Inc v. Accent Furs By Curry Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04865
Defendant:
Accent Furs By Curry Inc, Bon-Ton Stores Inc, Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. v. Pralle
as 1:2014cv00897
Plaintiff:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Pralle
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Gary Pralle
Counterclaim_defendant:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Landmark Technology, LLC v. The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Russell-Newman, Inc.
as 13-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Russell-Newman, Inc. and The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
